Sandhill Land & Cattle Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

161 N.W. 1053, 101 Neb. 24, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 55
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1917
DocketNo. 19321
StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.W. 1053 (Sandhill Land & Cattle Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandhill Land & Cattle Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 161 N.W. 1053, 101 Neb. 24, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 55 (Neb. 1917).

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is an action to recover damages prescribed by statute for delay in the transportation of live stock. Rev. St. 1913, secs. 6018, 6019. From a judgment in favor, of plaintiff for $400, defendant has appealed.

The invalidity of the statute under which the action was brought is pleaded as a defense. Since the appeal was taken the statute has been declared unconstitutional. Davison v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 100 Neb. 462. On authority of that decision, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed.

Sedgwick, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davison v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
160 N.W. 877 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 N.W. 1053, 101 Neb. 24, 1917 Neb. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandhill-land-cattle-co-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-neb-1917.