Sandfort v. Phase II Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sandfort v. Phase II Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Ass'n

522 S.W.3d 912, 2017 WL 2436922, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 551

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 6, 2017·No. WD 79755·Published

Opinion

ORDER

■ PER CURIAM: ■

Roger E. Sandfort and Roger B. Sand-fort appeal- the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Association, Inc.; Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc.; and Patrick Schmickley. on the Sandforts’ petition alleging malicious prosecution directed at a previously dismissed • civil suit. The uncontroverted facts establish that the Defendants relied on the advice of their counsel, and the grant of summary judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. Affirmed Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

■ PER CURIAM: ■

Roger E. Sandfort and Roger B. Sand-fort appeal- the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Association, Inc.; Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc.; and Patrick Schmickley. on the Sandforts’ petition alleging malicious prosecution directed at a previously dismissed • civil suit. The uncontroverted facts establish that the Defendants relied on the advice of their counsel, and the grant of summary judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. Affirmed Rule 84.16(b).

Sandfort v. Phase II Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Ass'n, 522 S.W.3d 912, 2017 WL 2436922, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 551 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

522 S.W.3d 912 (Sandfort v. Phase II Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.