Sandford v. Rose

2 Tyl. 428

Opinion

Curia.

(Jacob, Assistant Judge, absente.)

The Court are of opinion, that the evidence may be well admitted. The construction of the statute “ regulating the conveyances of real estate, and for the prevention of frauds therein,” contended for by the defendant’s counsel, cannot be correct; for it would go to convert a beneficial statute, made expressly for the prevention of fraud, into an engine of fraud. "

Chauncey Langdon and Darius Chipman, for plaintiff.

The evidence will be admitted.

The cause was continued for trial, and afterwards, on the decease of Rose, was accommodated.

--, for defendant.