Sandford v. Nickerson

13 A.2d 723, 91 N.H. 71, 1940 N.H. LEXIS 20
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 27, 1940·No. No. 3164.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only issue raised by the defendant’s plea was one of title. Section 18 of the Uniform Sales Act, which is in force here, (P. L., c. 166, s. 18) provides that “The property in them [ascertained goods] is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred.” The question of intention is one of fact and the referee, by his general findings in favor of the plaintiff, inferentially found that title had passed to him. The evidence regarding the transaction of July 19, when the plaintiff paid the entire purchase price for the boat and the defendant executed the so-called “bill of sale,” fully sustained the referee’s conclusion.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandford v. Nickerson, 13 A.2d 723, 91 N.H. 71, 1940 N.H. LEXIS 20 (N.H. 1940).

13 A.2d 723 (Sandford v. Nickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Sweatt
57 A.2d 157 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1948)