Sandford T. Pulley v. Glenn E. Ball, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 28, 2018·No. 03-18-00378-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00378-CV

Sandford T. Pulley, Appellant

v.

Glenn E. Ball, III, Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-17-005293, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 16, 2018. On August 20, 2018,

this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to

file a satisfactory response by August 30, 2018, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for

want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 28, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandford T. Pulley v. Glenn E. Ball, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Sandford T. Pulley v. Glenn E. Ball, III (Sandford T. Pulley v. Glenn E. Ball, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.