Sanderson v. United States

N.D. Ohio

Sanderson v. United States

876 F. Supp. 938, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5432, 1995 WL 104732

District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided January 27, 1995·No. No. 3:91 CV 7428·Published

Opinion

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ENTRY

CARR, District Judge.

Now come the parties, by and through counsel, and stipulate that the court may vacate its Memorandum and Order of April 29, 1994, 862 F.Supp. 196, which granted summary judgment to plaintiff and that the claims and counterclaims asserted herein may be dismissed with prejudice.

For the reasons stated above,

IT IS ORDERED that this court’s Memorandum and Order of April 29, 1994 which granted summary judgment to plaintiff be vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ENTRY

CARR, District Judge.

Now come the parties, by and through counsel, and stipulate that the court may vacate its Memorandum and Order of April 29, 1994, 862 F.Supp. 196, which granted summary judgment to plaintiff and that the claims and counterclaims asserted herein may be dismissed with prejudice.

For the reasons stated above,

IT IS ORDERED that this court’s Memorandum and Order of April 29, 1994 which granted summary judgment to plaintiff be vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Sanderson v. United States, 876 F. Supp. 938, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5432, 1995 WL 104732 (N.D. Ohio 1995).

Pincite

876 F. Supp. 938 (Sanderson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related