Sanderson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sanderson v. State

98 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 692

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1924·No. 3 Div. 465.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN,. P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated by affidavit and warrant in the court of common pleas of Montgomery county, the charge being for the violation of the prohibition laws of the state. From a judgment of conviction in said court an appeal was taken to the circuit court, where he was tried upon a complaint filed by the solicitor charging the same offense. In the cir *693 cuit court he was tried by a jury, again convicted, and judgment was pronounced accordingly, from which this appeal is taken. The, appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The record appears regular in all things, and, being free from error, the judgment of the circuit court will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN,. P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated by affidavit and warrant in the court of common pleas of Montgomery county, the charge being for the violation of the prohibition laws of the state. From a judgment of conviction in said court an appeal was taken to the circuit court, where he was tried upon a complaint filed by the solicitor charging the same offense. In the cir *693 cuit court he was tried by a jury, again convicted, and judgment was pronounced accordingly, from which this appeal is taken. The, appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The record appears regular in all things, and, being free from error, the judgment of the circuit court will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Sanderson v. State, 98 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

98 So. 925 (Sanderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.