Sanderson v. State

98 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 692
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 5, 1924
Docket3 Div. 465.
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 925 (Sanderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanderson v. State, 98 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

BRICKEN,. P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated by affidavit and warrant in the court of common pleas of Montgomery county, the charge being for the violation of the prohibition laws of the state. From a judgment of conviction in said court an appeal was taken to the circuit court, where he was tried upon a complaint filed by the solicitor charging the same offense. In the cir *693 cuit court he was tried by a jury, again convicted, and judgment was pronounced accordingly, from which this appeal is taken. The, appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The record appears regular in all things, and, being free from error, the judgment of the circuit court will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 925, 19 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanderson-v-state-alactapp-1924.