Sanderson v. State

79 So. 145, 16 Ala. App. 471, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 157
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1918·No. 8 Div. 612.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFOBD, J.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the court cannot intelligently pass upon the charges refused to defendant, although made a part of the record. The record seems in all things regular.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanderson v. State, 79 So. 145, 16 Ala. App. 471, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 157 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

79 So. 145 (Sanderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Couric v. City of Eufaula
138 So. 557 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)