Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co.

1925 OK 722, 239 P. 574, 113 Okla. 115, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 913
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 15, 1925
Docket16327
StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK 722 (Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co., 1925 OK 722, 239 P. 574, 113 Okla. 115, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 913 (Okla. 1925).

Opinion

PEtR CURIAM.

This case is appealed by plaintiff in error from a judgment rendered against him on the 3rd day of November, 1921, in the district court of Tulsa county. The record fails to show that plaintiff in error gave notice of his intention to appeal as required by section 782, C. O. S. 1921. This is fatal to this appeal. This statute is mandatory and jurisdictional. Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Holbert v. Patrick, 74 Okla. 290, 176 Pac. 903. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins v. Lynholm
1922 OK 202 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Holbert v. Patrick
1918 OK 685 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Crawford v. Shintaffer
1923 OK 521 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Miller v. Brownfield
1918 OK 542 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK 722, 239 P. 574, 113 Okla. 115, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanderson-v-hanchett-bond-co-okla-1925.