Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co.

1925 OK 722, 239 P. 574, 113 Okla. 115, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 913

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 15, 1925·No. 16327·Published

Opinion

PEtR CURIAM.

This case is appealed by plaintiff in error from a judgment rendered against him on the 3rd day of November, 1921, in the district court of Tulsa county. The record fails to show that plaintiff in error gave notice of his intention to appeal as required by section 782, C. O. S. 1921. This is fatal to this appeal. This statute is mandatory and jurisdictional. Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Holbert v. Patrick, 74 Okla. 290, 176 Pac. 903. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEtR CURIAM.

This case is appealed by plaintiff in error from a judgment rendered against him on the 3rd day of November, 1921, in the district court of Tulsa county. The record fails to show that plaintiff in error gave notice of his intention to appeal as required by section 782, C. O. S. 1921. This is fatal to this appeal. This statute is mandatory and jurisdictional. Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Holbert v. Patrick, 74 Okla. 290, 176 Pac. 903. The appeal is dismissed.

Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co., 1925 OK 722, 239 P. 574, 113 Okla. 115, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 913 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

1925 OK 722 (Sanderson v. Hanchett Bond Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related