Sanderson v Aydin BK Holding Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30159(U) January 9, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 529517/2022 Judge: Anne J. Swern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
At an IAS Trial Term, Part 75 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, at the Courthouse located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York on PRESEN T: the 9th day of January 2025.
HON. ANNE J. SWERN, J.S.C.
ANNETTE SANDERS ON, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ORDER ESTATE OF THOMAS A. SANDERS ON AND RENDEL SANDERSON, AS PROPOSE D SUCCESS OR OF THE Index No.: 529517/'2022 ESTATE OF THOMAS A. SANDERSON, Calendar No.: 11 , 12 and 13 Plaintiff(s) , Motion Seq.: 002, 003 & 004 : against:
AYDIN BK HOLDING INC. AND NZ PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.,
Defendant(s).
Recitation of the following papers as required by CPL R 2219(a): Papers Numbered 1 Notice of Motion, Affirmation, Affidavits and Exhibits (MS_002) (NYSCEF 92: 118, 112)) .............................. ................. l , 2 Memorandum of Law in Opposition (NYSCEF 127) .............................................. 3 Reply Affirmation (NYSCEF 130 : 131) ....... ...... ...... ............................. ..... .. ........ ...4
Order to Show Cause and Affirmation (MS_ 003) (NYSCEF 119 - 121) .... .. .......................... .. ............ ....... 5, 6
Notice of Cross: Motion, Affirmation/Affidavits, Memorandum of Law and Exhibits (MS_ 004) (NYSCEF 124: 129) .......... ........ 7, 8 Affirmation in Opposition (NYSCEF 132) ..... .. .... ..... .................... .... ........ .............. 9 Reply Affirmation with Exhibit (NYSCEF 134: 135) .................... .......... .... .. ....... 10
1 New York City Council Member Rita Joseph (40 th District) and New York State Senator Kevin Parker each
submitted letters to the Court dated 1/8/2025 on behalf of plaintiff. A messenger delivered the letters to the Court on the morning of 1/9/2025 . The Court provided copies of the letters to the parties' attorneys . After reviewing the letters, defendants ' attorney's objection to including these letters as part of the record was sustained.
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page J of 5
[* 1] 1 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
Upon the f oregoing papers and after oral argument on the record, Defendants ' motion for
summary judgment dismissin g this action pursuant to CP LR § 3 212 is granted is as follows :
Procedural History
The only remaining motion for determination after oral argument is plaintiff's motion for
summary judgmen t pursuant to CPLR § 3212 [b] (MS_002). Plaintiff has retained and appeared
by new counsel thereby rendering the Order to Show Cause to be relieved as counsel by
plaintiff's prior counsel moot (MS_003). Plaintiff's cross: motion for an order extending
plaintiff's time to serve opposition to defendants ' motion for summary judgmen t and allowing
plaintiff to retain an expert is also denied as moot since plaintiff has now served opposition to the
motion with the expert's report (MS_004).
Facts
Briefly, plaintiff alleges that the premises known as 318 East 16 Street, Brooklyn , New th
York, Block 5146 and Lot 28 , was sold in foreclosure on 10/ 17/2019. However, plaintiff was not
the mortgagor. It is plaintiff' s claim that the deed dated 11 / l 0/2004 that transferred the premises
from her husband (now deceased) to Sid Lyn & Associates was a forgery (Ex. 0: NYSCEF
#109). The property was then transferred to Joyce Halls who defaulted on a mortgage in the
amount of $649,000.00 (Ex. A: NYSCEF 95). A foreclosure action was commenced under Index
#31761 /2007 (Id.). Annette Sanderson sued therein as John Doe was served with the summons
and complaint in the foreclosure action on 8/28/2007 (Ex. U: NYSCEF # 115). A Judgment of
Foreclosure and Sale was entered on 5/8/2018 and the Referee conducted the sale on 10/17/2019
(Ex. B: NYSCEF #96). A Referee 's Deed was executed 12/20/2019 and delivered on 1/2/2020
(Ex. C: NYSCEF #97).
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page 2 of 5
[* 2] 2 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
On 5/28/2009, plaintiff appeared for a conference in the foreclosure action and raised the
issue of a "fraudulent mortgage" (Ex. V: NYSCEF # 116) but did not seek to serve a late answer
in the foreclosure action until January 2015 (Ex. W: NYSCEF # 117). However, plaintiff
withdrew her application by Order to Show Cause to serve an answer in the foreclosure
action (Id.).
Analysis
Based on these facts, plaintiff's interest in the property and right of redemption were
extinguished as a matter of law upon entry of the judgment of foreclosure even before the
referee's deed is delivered (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 880, 881 [2d
Dept. 2020]). Plaintiff failed to serve an answer and assert the defenses of a forged deed in the
foreclosure action (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 883).
Therefore, accepting as true plaintiff's expert's opinion that the deceased's signature on
the 11/10/2004 deed is a forgery, plaintiff's interest in the property has been extinguished as a
matter of law (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 880) and the need for
discovery, as asserted by plaintiff will not revive plaintiff's right of redemption or interest in the
property or lead to relevant evidence or facts essential to oppose plaintiff's motion for summary
judgment (See 7I: 2 I Loubet, LLC v. Bank ofAmerica, NA., 208 AD3d 736, 740 [2d Dept.
2022)).
Additionally, since plaintiff was made a party to the foreclosure action (NYSCEF #115),
she cannot now collaterally attack the judgment of foreclosure and sale and this action must be
dismissed (IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, 105 AD3d 704 [2d Dept. 2013); cf Deramo v.
Laffey, 149 AD3d 800 [2d Dept. 2017) [The forged deed was declared null and void in a
subsequent action where owners were not parties to the underlying foreclosure action.]).
Annette Sa11derson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page 3 of 5
[* 3] 3 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
Moreover, "[V]acatur [of the deed can] only be obtained by way of a motion to vacate the
judgment of foreclosure and sale" in the foreclosure action (IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, 105
AD3d 706; CPLR § 5015 [a]). Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact (Zuckerman v. City of New
York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Accordingly, summary judgment is warranted, and the action
must be dismissed (Id .; IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, supra) ; and See 71: 21 Loubet, LLC v.
Bank ofAmerica, NA. , 208 AD3d 742).
Finally, defendants ' request for attorneys ' fees and costs is denied. The attorneys did not
submit an affirmation of services and costs associated with this lawsuit.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanderson v Aydin BK Holding Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30159(U) January 9, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 529517/2022 Judge: Anne J. Swern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
At an IAS Trial Term, Part 75 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, at the Courthouse located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York on PRESEN T: the 9th day of January 2025.
HON. ANNE J. SWERN, J.S.C.
ANNETTE SANDERS ON, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ORDER ESTATE OF THOMAS A. SANDERS ON AND RENDEL SANDERSON, AS PROPOSE D SUCCESS OR OF THE Index No.: 529517/'2022 ESTATE OF THOMAS A. SANDERSON, Calendar No.: 11 , 12 and 13 Plaintiff(s) , Motion Seq.: 002, 003 & 004 : against:
AYDIN BK HOLDING INC. AND NZ PROPERTIES GROUP, INC.,
Defendant(s).
Recitation of the following papers as required by CPL R 2219(a): Papers Numbered 1 Notice of Motion, Affirmation, Affidavits and Exhibits (MS_002) (NYSCEF 92: 118, 112)) .............................. ................. l , 2 Memorandum of Law in Opposition (NYSCEF 127) .............................................. 3 Reply Affirmation (NYSCEF 130 : 131) ....... ...... ...... ............................. ..... .. ........ ...4
Order to Show Cause and Affirmation (MS_ 003) (NYSCEF 119 - 121) .... .. .......................... .. ............ ....... 5, 6
Notice of Cross: Motion, Affirmation/Affidavits, Memorandum of Law and Exhibits (MS_ 004) (NYSCEF 124: 129) .......... ........ 7, 8 Affirmation in Opposition (NYSCEF 132) ..... .. .... ..... .................... .... ........ .............. 9 Reply Affirmation with Exhibit (NYSCEF 134: 135) .................... .......... .... .. ....... 10
1 New York City Council Member Rita Joseph (40 th District) and New York State Senator Kevin Parker each
submitted letters to the Court dated 1/8/2025 on behalf of plaintiff. A messenger delivered the letters to the Court on the morning of 1/9/2025 . The Court provided copies of the letters to the parties' attorneys . After reviewing the letters, defendants ' attorney's objection to including these letters as part of the record was sustained.
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page J of 5
[* 1] 1 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
Upon the f oregoing papers and after oral argument on the record, Defendants ' motion for
summary judgment dismissin g this action pursuant to CP LR § 3 212 is granted is as follows :
Procedural History
The only remaining motion for determination after oral argument is plaintiff's motion for
summary judgmen t pursuant to CPLR § 3212 [b] (MS_002). Plaintiff has retained and appeared
by new counsel thereby rendering the Order to Show Cause to be relieved as counsel by
plaintiff's prior counsel moot (MS_003). Plaintiff's cross: motion for an order extending
plaintiff's time to serve opposition to defendants ' motion for summary judgmen t and allowing
plaintiff to retain an expert is also denied as moot since plaintiff has now served opposition to the
motion with the expert's report (MS_004).
Facts
Briefly, plaintiff alleges that the premises known as 318 East 16 Street, Brooklyn , New th
York, Block 5146 and Lot 28 , was sold in foreclosure on 10/ 17/2019. However, plaintiff was not
the mortgagor. It is plaintiff' s claim that the deed dated 11 / l 0/2004 that transferred the premises
from her husband (now deceased) to Sid Lyn & Associates was a forgery (Ex. 0: NYSCEF
#109). The property was then transferred to Joyce Halls who defaulted on a mortgage in the
amount of $649,000.00 (Ex. A: NYSCEF 95). A foreclosure action was commenced under Index
#31761 /2007 (Id.). Annette Sanderson sued therein as John Doe was served with the summons
and complaint in the foreclosure action on 8/28/2007 (Ex. U: NYSCEF # 115). A Judgment of
Foreclosure and Sale was entered on 5/8/2018 and the Referee conducted the sale on 10/17/2019
(Ex. B: NYSCEF #96). A Referee 's Deed was executed 12/20/2019 and delivered on 1/2/2020
(Ex. C: NYSCEF #97).
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page 2 of 5
[* 2] 2 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
On 5/28/2009, plaintiff appeared for a conference in the foreclosure action and raised the
issue of a "fraudulent mortgage" (Ex. V: NYSCEF # 116) but did not seek to serve a late answer
in the foreclosure action until January 2015 (Ex. W: NYSCEF # 117). However, plaintiff
withdrew her application by Order to Show Cause to serve an answer in the foreclosure
action (Id.).
Analysis
Based on these facts, plaintiff's interest in the property and right of redemption were
extinguished as a matter of law upon entry of the judgment of foreclosure even before the
referee's deed is delivered (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 880, 881 [2d
Dept. 2020]). Plaintiff failed to serve an answer and assert the defenses of a forged deed in the
foreclosure action (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 883).
Therefore, accepting as true plaintiff's expert's opinion that the deceased's signature on
the 11/10/2004 deed is a forgery, plaintiff's interest in the property has been extinguished as a
matter of law (Liberty Dabar Associates v. Mohammed, 183 AD3d 880) and the need for
discovery, as asserted by plaintiff will not revive plaintiff's right of redemption or interest in the
property or lead to relevant evidence or facts essential to oppose plaintiff's motion for summary
judgment (See 7I: 2 I Loubet, LLC v. Bank ofAmerica, NA., 208 AD3d 736, 740 [2d Dept.
2022)).
Additionally, since plaintiff was made a party to the foreclosure action (NYSCEF #115),
she cannot now collaterally attack the judgment of foreclosure and sale and this action must be
dismissed (IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, 105 AD3d 704 [2d Dept. 2013); cf Deramo v.
Laffey, 149 AD3d 800 [2d Dept. 2017) [The forged deed was declared null and void in a
subsequent action where owners were not parties to the underlying foreclosure action.]).
Annette Sa11derson v. Aydin 529517/2022 Page 3 of 5
[* 3] 3 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
Moreover, "[V]acatur [of the deed can] only be obtained by way of a motion to vacate the
judgment of foreclosure and sale" in the foreclosure action (IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, 105
AD3d 706; CPLR § 5015 [a]). Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact (Zuckerman v. City of New
York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Accordingly, summary judgment is warranted, and the action
must be dismissed (Id .; IndyMac Bank, FS.B. v. Vincoli, supra) ; and See 71: 21 Loubet, LLC v.
Bank ofAmerica, NA. , 208 AD3d 742).
Finally, defendants ' request for attorneys ' fees and costs is denied. The attorneys did not
submit an affirmation of services and costs associated with this lawsuit.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that defendants ' motion to for an order pursuant to CPLR § 3212 [b] is
granted and this action is dismissed in its entirety (MS_ 002), and it is further
ORDERED, that the branch of defendants ' motion to for an order pursuant to CPLR
§ 3212 [b] awarding attorneys ' fees and costs is denied (MS_002), and it is further
ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause relieving plaintiff's former counsel is denied as
moot (MS_003), and it is further
ORDERED that the branch of plaintiff's cross-motion to extend the time to oppose
defendants ' motion for summary judgment is denied as moot (MS_004), and it is further
ORDERED that the branch of plaintiff's cross-motion for an order denying defendants'
motion for summary judgment is denied (MS_ 004 ), and it is further
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 5295/7/2022 Page 4 of 5
[* 4] 4 of 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2025 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 529517/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2025
ORDERED that the branch of plaintiff's cross-motion for an order denying defendants '
motion for attorneys' fees and costs is granted.
This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
IJon. Anne J. Swern, J.S.C. /Dated: 1/9/2025 For Clerks use only:
MG - 'd- - Mo & Motion seq.# d-1) ,y
Annette Sanderson v. Aydin 529517/2012 Page5 o/5
[* 5] 5 of 5