Sanders v. Williams
This text of 73 Ga. 119 (Sanders v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[At the term when a case was tried, a motion for new trial was made. The judge made the rule nisi returnable in vacation, approved the grounds and handed the motion to the clerk, but it was not marked filed. At the time appointed, counsel for respondent appeared and announced that he waived the failure to serve him with a copy or with notice of the time for hearing. Counsel for the movant objected to the hearing, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, it not appearing that any order or consent was had fixing the hearing in vacation, and the motion and rule nisi not appearing to have been filed. The judge stated that he had approved the motion and brief of evidence; and handed them to the clerk during the term, and that, if it did not so appear, it was the fault of the latter. Movant’s counsel still insisted on his objection to the hearing. Counsel for respondent then moved to dismiss the motion for new trial and rule nisi, on the ground that they had never been filed in office. The judge sustained the motion, and movant excepted.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Ga. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-williams-ga-1884.