Sanders v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield

535 F. App'x 317

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2013·No. No. 13-6173·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. Warden, FCI Edgefield, No. 1:11-cv-01348-DCN, 2013 WL 271672 (D.S.C. Jan. 24, 2013). We deny Sanders’ motion for judicial notice of a 2009 parole hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. Warden, FCI Edgefield, No. 1:11-cv-01348-DCN, 2013 WL 271672 (D.S.C. Jan. 24, 2013). We deny Sanders’ motion for judicial notice of a 2009 parole hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sanders v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield, 535 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

535 F. App'x 317 (Sanders v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related