Sanders v. Wainwright

322 So. 2d 476
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1975
DocketNo. 46965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 So. 2d 476 (Sanders v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition for mandamus reflected a prima facie Brumit v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 39 (Fla.1974), violation which triggered the issuance of our writ herein. Respondent’s return concedes the Brumit violation occurring because of the old practice of making parole revocations effective at a future date after completion of an intervening sentence, which Brumit and its progeny no longer allow.

Respondent urges, however, that this inversion of sentences is “harmless” in the present circumstances where a recalculation would not give a different result in the time to be served, nor affect petitioner’s release date. In light of this fact and in accordance with our decision in Benyard v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 473 (Fla.1975), the writ heretofore issued is

Discharged.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Davis
697 So. 2d 311 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 So. 2d 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-wainwright-fla-1975.