Sanders v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

395 F. App'x 939
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2010·No. No. 10-1624·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complain without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. United States, No. 7:10-cv-00968-RBH (D.S.C. June 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 395 F. App'x 939 (4th Cir. 2010).

395 F. App'x 939 (Sanders v. United States Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 242 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Sanders v. Jackson
178 L. Ed. 2d 742 (Supreme Court, 2011)