Sanders v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. United States

267 F. App'x 303

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2008·No. 07-2071·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying his numerous post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. United States, No. 8:06-cv01528-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 24, 2007). We deny all of Sanders’ pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying his numerous post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. United States, No. 8:06-cv01528-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 24, 2007). We deny all of Sanders’ pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Sanders v. United States, 267 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 303 (Sanders v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.