Sanders v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

762 N.E.2d 1016, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 894
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 2002
Docket01-2016
StatusPublished

This text of 762 N.E.2d 1016 (Sanders v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 762 N.E.2d 1016, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 894 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-010108. On motion for admission pro hac vice of James Cockrum and Susan Lonowski by H. Lawson Walker for United Parcel Service, Inc. Motion granted.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Appeal allowed. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 N.E.2d 1016, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-united-parcel-serv-inc-ohio-2002.