Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad

179 F.3d 1244, 99 Daily Journal DAR 5985, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4709, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13372, 1999 WL 415349
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1999
DocketNo. 97-55046
StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.3d 1244 (Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad, 179 F.3d 1244, 99 Daily Journal DAR 5985, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4709, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13372, 1999 WL 415349 (9th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 154 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillip R. Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
154 F.3d 1037 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 F.3d 1244, 99 Daily Journal DAR 5985, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4709, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13372, 1999 WL 415349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-union-pacific-railroad-ca9-1999.