Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp.

911 So. 2d 1256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2005 WL 2373875
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-2768
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 911 So. 2d 1256 (Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp., 911 So. 2d 1256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2005 WL 2373875 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of the timeliness of Union Carbide’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens in the instant ease is identical to that in Fox v. Union Carbide Corp., 910 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fihe v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
966 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Kepner v. State
911 So. 2d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
911 So. 2d 1256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2005 WL 2373875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-union-carbide-corp-fladistctapp-2005.