Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp.
911 So. 2d 1256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2005 WL 2373875
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2005·No. No. 4D04-2768·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The issue of the timeliness of Union Carbide’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens in the instant ease is identical to that in Fox v. Union Carbide Corp., 910 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp., 911 So. 2d 1256, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, 2005 WL 2373875 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
911 So. 2d 1256 (Sanders v. Union Carbide Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fihe v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
966 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Kepner v. State
911 So. 2d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)