Sanders v. Townshend

New York Court of Common Pleas

Sanders v. Townshend

63 How. Pr. 343, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 217

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedJune 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 How. Pr. 343 (Sanders v. Townshend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. Townshend, 63 How. Pr. 343, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 217 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Hoesen, J.

Motion for retaxation under section 3265. The action has ended. The event—i. e., the result of the litigation — was that the defendant obtained judgment. The costs of the appeal to the general term abided—i. e., depended upon — the final result of the litigation. When that result was reached- the party who prevailed became entitled to the costs of the appeal to the general term. The costs of that appeal belong, therefore, to the defendant, the party finally prevailing in the litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Hoesen, J.

Motion for retaxation under section 3265. The action has ended. The event—i. e., the result of the litigation — was that the defendant obtained judgment. The costs of the appeal to the general term abided—i. e., depended upon — the final result of the litigation. When that result was reached- the party who prevailed became entitled to the costs of the appeal to the general term. The costs of that appeal belong, therefore, to the defendant, the party finally prevailing in the litigation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 How. Pr. 343, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-townshend-nyctcompl-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack