Sanders v. State
This text of 201 S.W. 411 (Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance in that it is not in compliance with article 903, Code of Criminal Procedure. First, it fails to provide that defendant shall abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals; second, it fails to stipulate the obligation shall be joint and several in its liabilities of the sureties, and, third, it fails to show appellant was convicted of a felony. We find from an inspection of the recognizance that it does not comply with article 903, Code of Criminal Procedure in the respects indicated.. The motion is well taken, and the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 S.W. 411, 83 Tex. Crim. 110, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.