Sanders v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Sanders v. State

DecidedApril 18, 2011

Docket2011-UP-167

StatusUnpublished

This text of Sanders v. State (Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. State, (S.C. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Willie R. Sanders, Appellant,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appeal From Laurens County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-167
Submitted April 1, 2011 Filed April 18, 2011

AFFIRMED

Willie R. Sanders, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Ashley A. McMahan, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Willie R. Sanders appeals the circuit court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus as procedurally barred by the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Simpson, 275 S.C. 426, 429, 272 S.E.2d 431, 432 (1980) ("[T]he burden of showing that the [circuit] court erred is upon the appellant.").

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI