Sanders v. State

498 S.W.3d 530, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 931, 2016 WL 5030347
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103697
StatusPublished

This text of 498 S.W.3d 530 (Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. State, 498 S.W.3d 530, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 931, 2016 WL 5030347 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Columbus Sanders appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his “Motion for Reconsideration of Post-Conviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 29.15.” We have reviewed. the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them'‘use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 S.W.3d 530, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 931, 2016 WL 5030347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-state-moctapp-2016.