Sanders v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sanders v. State

498 S.W.3d 530, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 931, 2016 WL 5030347

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2016·No. No. ED 103697·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Columbus Sanders appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his “Motion for Reconsideration of Post-Conviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 29.15.” We have reviewed. the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them'‘use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Columbus Sanders appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his “Motion for Reconsideration of Post-Conviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 29.15.” We have reviewed. the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them'‘use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Sanders v. State, 498 S.W.3d 530, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 931, 2016 WL 5030347 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

498 S.W.3d 530 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.