Sanders v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sanders v. State

389 S.W.3d 745, 2013 WL 216339, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 80

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. WD 73667·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Myron R. Sanders was convicted by a jury of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest. Sanders now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an evidentiary hearing, and argues that the court erred in denying the motion in that his jury was constituted in violation of section 494.485 and that both trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to know or advise him that, because of this statutory violation, a mistrial was required. We affirm the denial of Sanders’s Rule 29.15 motion. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Myron R. Sanders was convicted by a jury of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest. Sanders now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an evidentiary hearing, and argues that the court erred in denying the motion in that his jury was constituted in violation of section 494.485 and that both trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to know or advise him that, because of this statutory violation, a mistrial was required. We affirm the denial of Sanders’s Rule 29.15 motion. Rule 84.16(b).

Sanders v. State, 389 S.W.3d 745, 2013 WL 216339, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 80 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 745 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.