Sanders v. State

253 S.E.2d 457, 149 Ga. App. 111, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Ga. App. 44
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 21, 1979·No. 57145·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for three counts of forgery. Held:

1. Error is urged on the trial judge’s failure to charge the provisions of Code Ann. § 26-1705.4 (CCG § 1705.4; Ga. L. 1969, pp. 128, 131) involving credit card fraud, which charge the defendant requested in writing. This enumeration is without merit since under the indictment as drawn, charging the defendant with forgery, Code § 26-1705.4 was not a lesser included offense. See Code Ann. § 26-505 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1249, 1267).

2. The defendant’s contention that certain evidence was inadmissible is without merit.

3. The trial judge’s action in increasing the defendant’s bond would not require the judge to disqualify himself from the trial of the case.

4. We do not consider an alleged error which was [112]*112raised for the first, time after the instant appeal had already been argued.

Submitted January 16, 1979 — Decided February 21, 1979. Walter F. Johnson, Jr., for appellant. William J. Smith, District Attorney, Douglas C. Pullen, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 253 S.E.2d 457, 149 Ga. App. 111, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1744 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

253 S.E.2d 457 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.