Sanders v. State
955 So. 2d 35, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3701, 2007 WL 754814
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 905 So. 2d 271 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2005)(when a sentence is silent as to whether two cases charged under a different information or indictment are consecutive or concurrent, the sentences shall run consecutively). See also Whipple v. Department of Corrections, 892 So.2d 554, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. State, 955 So. 2d 35, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3701, 2007 WL 754814 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
955 So. 2d 35 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whipple v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE
892 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)