Sanders v. State

823 So. 2d 280, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 2002 WL 1815882
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2002·No. No. 2D00-5125·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Rogelio Sanders appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Sanders might have to file a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850 and Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Be[281]*281cause the time for Sanders to seek such relief expired during the pendency of this appeal, any motion filed within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case shall be considered timely filed. See Finan v. State, 787 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 823 So. 2d 280, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 2002 WL 1815882 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 280 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balkcom v. State
900 So. 2d 706 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)