Sanders v. State

991 S.W.2d 611, 338 Ark. 216, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 323
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 17, 1999·No. CR 99-628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Corey Sanders, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

This court has held that we will grant a motion for rule on the clerk when the attorney admits that the record was not timely filed due to an error on his part. See. e.g., Terry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986). Here, the attorney does not admit fault on his part. We have held that a statement that it was someone else’s fault or no one’s fault will not suffice. Clark v. State, 289 Ark. 382, 711 S.W.2d 162 (1986). Therefore, appellant’s motion must be denied.

The appellant’s attorney shall file within thirty days from the date of this per curiam motion and affidavit in this case accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript, and upon filing same, the motion will be granted and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 991 S.W.2d 611, 338 Ark. 216, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 323 (Ark. 1999).

991 S.W.2d 611 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. State
146 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)