Sanders v. State

740 S.W.2d 928, 294 Ark. 207, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2467
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 300 Ark. 25
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 21, 1987·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Lester Clayton Sanders, Jr. by his attorney, Josef V. Hobson, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. State, 740 S.W.2d 928, 294 Ark. 207, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2467 (Ark. 1987).

740 S.W.2d 928 (Sanders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)