Sanders v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

102 F. App'x 809

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2004·No. 04-6480·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Sanders appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny his motion to remand his action back to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sanders v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-03-1127-6-25AK (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We deny Sanders’s motion to consolidate, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Sanders appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny his motion to remand his action back to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sanders v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-03-1127-6-25AK (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We deny Sanders’s motion to consolidate, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sanders v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 102 F. App'x 809 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

102 F. App'x 809 (Sanders v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.