Sanders v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION
BRANDY SANDERS PLAINTIFF
v. CIVIL NO. 2:19-cv-02095-MEF
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner Social Security Administration1 DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, we conclude that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to the Plaintiff is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed and remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and cost under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes “not appealable” i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 19th day of November, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Ford HON. MARK E. FORD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 Andrew Saul was confirmed by the Senate on June 4, 2019, replacing Nancy A. Berryhill as the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Sanders v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.