Sanders v. Rumsey
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655
This text of 169 F. 1022 (Sanders v. Rumsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sanders v. Rumsey, 169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655 (2d Cir. 1909).
Opinion
Following Eidman v. Tilghman, 136 Fed. 141, 69 C. C. A. 139, and Kinney v. Conant (C. C. A.), 166 Fed. 720, judgment is affirmed. Submitted without argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eidman v. Tilghman
136 F. 141 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Kinney v. Conant
166 F. 720 (First Circuit, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-rumsey-ca2-1909.