Sanders v. Rumsey
169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655
Opinion
Following Eidman v. Tilghman, 136 Fed. 141, 69 C. C. A. 139, and Kinney v. Conant (C. C. A.), 166 Fed. 720, judgment is affirmed. Submitted without argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanders v. Rumsey, 169 F. 1022, 94 C.C.A. 668, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4655 (2d Cir. 1909).
169 F. 1022 (Sanders v. Rumsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eidman v. Tilghman
136 F. 141 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Kinney v. Conant
166 F. 720 (First Circuit, 1909)