Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co.

168 A. 388, 114 N.J. Eq. 21, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1345

DecidedSeptember 27, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A. 388 (Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co., 168 A. 388, 114 N.J. Eq. 21, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1345 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 162, sub nom. Sanders v. Van Sant-Willis Co.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 162, sub nom. Sanders v. Van Sant-Willis Co.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A. 388, 114 N.J. Eq. 21, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-osborne-marsellis-co-nj-1933.