Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co.

168 A. 388, 114 N.J. Eq. 21, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1345
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 162, sub nom. Sanders v. Van Sant-Willis Co.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co., 168 A. 388, 114 N.J. Eq. 21, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1345 (N.J. 1933).

168 A. 388 (Sanders v. Osborne & Marsellis Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.