Sanders v. North Carolina

302 F. App'x 222
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 25, 2008
DocketNo. 08-1499
StatusPublished

This text of 302 F. App'x 222 (Sanders v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. North Carolina, 302 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. North Carolina, No. 7:07-cv-03174-GRA (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2008). Further, we deny the pending motion to dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-north-carolina-ca4-2008.