Sanders v. N.C. D.O.C.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedAugust 3, 2004
DocketI.C. NO. TA-16913
StatusPublished

This text of Sanders v. N.C. D.O.C. (Sanders v. N.C. D.O.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. N.C. D.O.C., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Decision and Order, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Baddour and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Decision and Order except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Decision and Order of Deputy Commissioner Baddour with modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. It is stipulated that all parties are properly before the Industrial Commission, are subject to and bound by the provisions of the Tort Claims Act, and the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and of the subject matter.

2. It is stipulated that all parties have been correctly designated, and there is no question as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of the parties.

3. It is stipulated that neither of the parties in this action is appearing in a representative capacity.

4. It is stipulated that there are no third-party defendants or cross-claimants.

5. It is stipulated that this action was filed with the Commission pursuant to the provisions of the North Carolina Tort Claims Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291 et seq., against the Department of Correction, which is a department of the State of North Carolina.

6. It is stipulated that plaintiff, Florine K. Sanders, has alleged negligence on the part of James C. Pierce, James McCann, James Minter, Richard Barnes, Rodney Phillips, Ronnie Carter, and Corrections Officer Daniels.

7. It is stipulated that the Defendant filed an Answer with the Commission denying all allegations of negligence.

8. It is stipulated that at all times relevant to this case, the individuals alleged in the Amended Affidavit as negligent employees or agents of the State of North Carolina were in fact employees or agents of the State of North Carolina.

9. The parties stipulate and agree that on or about the morning of April 18, 1999, the plaintiff was a lawful visitor at the Caswell County Correctional Center near Yanceyville. Plaintiff was in the visitation room and sat down in a chair provided by the North Carolina Department of Correction. The chair broke and plaintiff fell to the floor. This occurrence is the incident that gave rise to this tort claim.

10. The parties stipulate and agree that prior to her fall of April 18, 1999, plaintiff was totally disabled as a result of a workers' compensation injury to her knee and low back. She continues to be totally disabled as a result of her workers' compensation injuries. As a result, the plaintiff is not claiming any wage loss as damages in this matter.

***********
At the close of the liability evidence, the Deputy Commissioner ruled from the bench on the issue of negligence as set forth below. Based upon the evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff was 59 years old.

2. On April 18, 1999, plaintiff went to Caswell County Correctional Center in Yanceyville, North Carolina, to visit an inmate. She was allowed into the visitation room and sat down in a chair that was provided for visitors. As plaintiff sat down, the chair broke and she fell to the floor injuring her left shoulder and back.

3. The visitation room was approximately 30 feet by 40 feet in dimension and was open except for one post or column in the middle of the room. The visitation room was furnished with several vending machines and had twenty-five tables set up in rows. Each table was arranged with four chairs around it. The plastic chairs had metal legs that went from front to back like a horseshoe. The front leg and back leg were connected by a metal brace that was welded on each leg.

4. Plaintiff's chair collapsed as a result of the leg braces separating from the legs at the weld.

5. Cracks in the leg bracing welds of fifteen other chairs in the waiting room were found upon visual inspection following plaintiff's accident. This evidence was admitted only for the purpose of showing that the condition of the chairs could have been discovered upon visual inspection.

6. The shift Officer in Charge was primarily responsible for the maintenance and inspection of the Caswell County visitation room and its contents on the date of injury. The Officer in Charge that date was Lt. James W. McCann. The other employees of defendant that were assigned to the visiting room at the time of the injury were James Minter, Richard Barnes, and Rodney Phillips.

7. The building containing the visitation room was completed in 1992 or 1993 and new furniture was put into the visitation room at that time. The furniture was never changed out prior to the date of injury.

8. Defendant did not have any policy, plan, or procedure regarding the replacement, periodic inspection, or maintenance of its chairs or other furniture in the visitation room, except for periodic inspections for contraband. There was no standard operating procedure regarding the safety inspection of the chairs. Defendant did not properly train its employees in the proper method of inspecting the chairs for safety defects. It was not reasonable to have such deficiencies relating to furniture that was used by lawful visitors to the facility. Lt. McCann and his supervisors were negligent in failing to implement a policy, plan, training, or procedure for chair safety inspections prior to the date of injury.

9. It was the visitation officers' duty to inspect the chairs for any contraband prior to their use. During the inspection, they would make a cursory visual inspection of the chair legs; however, the primary purpose of the inspection was for contraband. This inspection would take only a few seconds per chair. The chairs were never inspected for cracks in the legs prior to the time of injury. It was not reasonable for defendant's employees to make such a cursory safety inspection of furniture that was used by lawful visitors of the facility. The Full Commission finds that Lt. McCann, James Minter, Richard Barnes, and Rodney Phillips were negligent in failing to properly inspect the chairs prior to the time of injury.

10. Had the defendant's employees not been negligent in their prior inspections or in failing to have any policy, plan, training, or procedure regarding the replacement, inspection, or maintenance of its chairs, visible defects in the chairs would have been found and corrected prior to plaintiff's fall and injuries. As such, the negligence of defendant's employees was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries to her back and left shoulder.

11. Following the accident, plaintiff was transported by EMS to Danville Regional Hospital in Danville, Virginia. After being released from the Danville Regional Hospital emergency room, plaintiff sought treatment from her family physician, Dr. Arnett Coleman. Dr. Coleman treated plaintiff's shoulder condition with water therapy and prescription medications. Dr. Coleman then referred plaintiff to Dr. Laurence Dahners, an orthopedic surgeon.

12. All of Dr. Coleman's treatment of plaintiff's shoulder condition resulted from her fall on April 18, 1999. Such treatment was medically reasonable and necessary, as were the charges for the same.

13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. MORELAND CHEMICAL COMPANY
154 S.E.2d 502 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Rector v. James
254 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanders v. N.C. D.O.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-nc-doc-ncworkcompcom-2004.