Sanders v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. Maryland

103 F. App'x 520

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2004·No. No. 04-1139·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Maryland, No. CA-03-3619-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 8, 2004 & entered Jan. 9, 2004). We also find no error in the district court’s decision to return Sanders’ motions after closing the case. We deny all of Sanders’ outstanding motions, including his motions for vacation, alterations, voluntary dismissal, settlement, to stay, and for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Maryland, No. CA-03-3619-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 8, 2004 & entered Jan. 9, 2004). We also find no error in the district court’s decision to return Sanders’ motions after closing the case. We deny all of Sanders’ outstanding motions, including his motions for vacation, alterations, voluntary dismissal, settlement, to stay, and for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sanders v. Maryland, 103 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

103 F. App'x 520 (Sanders v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.