Sanders v. Lansing

11 P. 702, 70 Cal. 429, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 808
California Supreme Court·Decided August 25, 1886·No. No. 11318·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Myrick, J.

The defendant agreed with plaintiff to sell to him a tract of land at a stipulated price per acre, possession to be given on full payment. Plaintiff paid five thousand two hundred dollars, part of the purchase price. Defendant having failed to convey, this acti/ [430]*430was brought to recover the money paid. At the time of making the contract, defendant was not in condition to give title, the title being in other parties, nor has she since acquired the title. The defendant can give neither title nor possession. Under such circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the money paid.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Ross, J.; and McKinstry, J., concurred

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. Lansing, 11 P. 702, 70 Cal. 429, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 808 (Cal. 1886).

11 P. 702 (Sanders v. Lansing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milton Realty Co. v. Butterfield
262 P. 419 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Thomas v. Palmer
248 P. 887 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1926)
Craig v. White
202 P. 648 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Sperry v. Planters Rice Mill Co.
84 S.E. 492 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
People v. Cristy
9 P.R. 521 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1905)
Pueblo v. Cristy
9 P.R. Dec. 584 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1905)
Benson v. Shotwell
25 P. 249 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Burks v. Davies
24 P. 613 (California Supreme Court, 1890)