Sanders v. Keithley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sanders v. Keithley

367 S.W.3d 648, 2012 WL 1994989, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 760

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. ED 96906·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry and Kathryn Sanders (collectively “Sanders”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for injunctive relief in their action against E.A. Keithley and E.A. Keithley Farms Partnership, L.P. (collectively “Keithley”), and denying their motion for remittitur on Keithley’s counterclaim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry and Kathryn Sanders (collectively “Sanders”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for injunctive relief in their action against E.A. Keithley and E.A. Keithley Farms Partnership, L.P. (collectively “Keithley”), and denying their motion for remittitur on Keithley’s counterclaim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Sanders v. Keithley, 367 S.W.3d 648, 2012 WL 1994989, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 760 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 648 (Sanders v. Keithley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.