Sanders v. Independent Natl. Life Ins.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Sanders v. Independent Natl. Life Ins.

133 So. 451, 16 La. App. 212, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 447

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 23, 1931

DocketNo. 13,567

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 133 So. 451 (Sanders v. Independent Natl. Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. Independent Natl. Life Ins., 133 So. 451, 16 La. App. 212, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 447 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

The plaintiff, a beneficiary under a policy of industrial life insurance, brings this suit for $126, the face value of the policy. The case is defended upon the ground that the policy had lapsed because of the failure to pay premiums. Answering this contention plaintiff claims that an attempt was made to pay the premiums, but that the defendant insurance company refused to accept further payments because of the fact that someone living in the same house with her had contracted tuberculosis and the officials of the company were, unwilling to take-the risk of infection, which further transactions with her might involve.

Of course, if the premiums were tendered and arbitrarily refused the policy did not lapse. Newton v. National Life Ins. Co., 161 La. 357, 108 So. 769. The testimony of plaintiff and that of her daughter, who testified in her behalf, is in hopeless conflict with that of the manager and the cashier of defendant company, but Mr. Johnston Armstrong, a member of this bar, without any interest in the litigation, testified that the plaintiff called upon him and endeavored to have the company accept premiums and that he called at the office of defendant company for that purpose and was there informed that the premiums would not be accepted for a sufficient reason, and “the courts were open to him if he had any claim.” His testimony is sufficient to resolve the doubt created by the conflicting evidence in favor of the plaintiff. This was evidently the view of the trial court and we believe its judgment was correct.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERFIELD, J.

The plaintiff, a beneficiary under a policy of industrial life insurance, brings this suit for $126, the face value of the policy. The case is defended upon the ground that the policy had lapsed because of the failure to pay premiums. Answering this contention plaintiff claims that an attempt was made to pay the premiums, but that the defendant insurance company refused to accept further payments because of the fact that someone living in the same house with her had contracted tuberculosis and the officials of the company were, unwilling to take-the risk of infection, which further transactions with her might involve.

Of course, if the premiums were tendered and arbitrarily refused the policy did not lapse. Newton v. National Life Ins. Co., 161 La. 357, 108 So. 769. The testimony of plaintiff and that of her daughter, who testified in her behalf, is in hopeless conflict with that of the manager and the cashier of defendant company, but Mr. Johnston Armstrong, a member of this bar, without any interest in the litigation, testified that the plaintiff called upon him and endeavored to have the company accept premiums and that he called at the office of defendant company for that purpose and was there informed that the premiums would not be accepted for a sufficient reason, and “the courts were open to him if he had any claim.” His testimony is sufficient to resolve the doubt created by the conflicting evidence in favor of the plaintiff. This was evidently the view of the trial court and we believe its judgment was correct.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 So. 451, 16 La. App. 212, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-independent-natl-life-ins-lactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack