Sanders v. Impellitier
This text of 291 So. 2d 68 (Sanders v. Impellitier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William D. SANDERS, Appellant,
v.
Kenneth C. IMPELLITIER et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*69 William D. Sanders and Donald L. Burrie, Pompano Beach, for appellant.
Richard A. Bird of Bird & Carpenter, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, in a civil action for damages, filed interlocutory appeal seeking review of an order granting the plaintiffs' motion for inspection and discovery and denying the defendant's motion for a protective order. The order is nonappealable and we, therefore, lack jurisdiction. We decline to treat the interlocutory appeal as a petition for common law certiorari as it has not been made to appear that appellant does not have a full, adequate and complete remedy by appeal after final judgment. Kauffman v. King, Fla. 1956, 89 So.2d 24; Simpson v. Broward County, Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 193; Bland v. Mitchell, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So.2d 224.
Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
OWEN, C.J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 So. 2d 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-impellitier-fladistctapp-1974.