Sanders v. Hamilton

Superior Court of North Carolina

Sanders v. Hamilton

3 N.C. 226

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1802·Published

Opinion

1\/fAJiSHALL, Chief Justice.

It is said Hamilton warranted fhfi ifconrli { the Wench fiom whom desended the slaves afterwards recovered by Streater from Sanders. The record of that recovery is new offered, to be read to prove S treater’s title. I am of opinion, that as Hamilton was no. party to that suit, nor privy, is [227] ¿armot be read to prove Sweater's title : it may, however, to shey; that Sanders was evicted.

And it was accordingly read for that purpose only»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1\/fAJiSHALL, Chief Justice.

It is said Hamilton warranted fhfi ifconrli { the Wench fiom whom desended the slaves afterwards recovered by Streater from Sanders. The record of that recovery is new offered, to be read to prove S treater’s title. I am of opinion, that as Hamilton was no. party to that suit, nor privy, is [227] ¿armot be read to prove Sweater's title : it may, however, to shey; that Sanders was evicted.

And it was accordingly read for that purpose only»

Sanders v. Hamilton, 3 N.C. 226 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

3 N.C. 226 (Sanders v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.