Sanders v. Hamilton
This text of 3 N.C. 226 (Sanders v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is said Hamilton warranted fhfi ifconrli { the Wench fiom whom desended the slaves afterwards recovered by Streater from Sanders. The record of that recovery is new offered, to be read to prove S treater’s title. I am of opinion, that as Hamilton was no. party to that suit, nor privy, is [227]*227¿armot be read to prove Sweater's title : it may, however, to shey; that Sanders was evicted.
And it was accordingly read for that purpose only»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.C. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-hamilton-ncsuperct-1802.