Sanders v. Gaston County

467 F. App'x 202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2012
DocketNo. 11-2142
StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 202 (Sanders v. Gaston County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Gaston County, 467 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Sanders’ civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sanders’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sanders has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-gaston-county-ca4-2012.