Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

657 F. App'x 211
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1921
StatusPublished

This text of 657 F. App'x 211 (Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 657 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order compelling him to attend a deposition and the magistrate judge’s order denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Sanders seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Sanders’ motion for a transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-family-dollar-stores-inc-ca4-2016.