Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
This text of 657 F. App'x 211 (Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order compelling him to attend a deposition and the magistrate judge’s order denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Sanders seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Sanders’ motion for a transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
657 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-family-dollar-stores-inc-ca4-2016.