Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

657 F. App'x 211
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2016·No. No. 16-1921·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order compelling him to attend a deposition and the magistrate judge’s order denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Sanders seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Sanders’ motion for a transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 657 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2016).

657 F. App'x 211 (Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)