Sanders v. Extine
This text of Sanders v. Extine (Sanders v. Extine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7928
KEITH LEMONT SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. KIMBER EXTINE, Deputy Sheriff of York County,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-727-2)
Submitted: April 16, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Lemont Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Keith Lemont Sanders appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Sanders v. Extine, No. CA-03-727-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 27, 2003 &
entered Oct. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sanders v. Extine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-extine-ca4-2004.