Sanders v. Egerton
This text of 4 S.C.L. 45 (Sanders v. Egerton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A recovery in trespass may be pleaded in bar to an action for the same goods, for the taking whereof the damages in trespass have been recovered, if it should appear the goods have been destroyed or converted, jsa that the owner has not repossessed himself of them, and that the damages were given as well for the property as for the trespass. The direction therefore was right.
New trial refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.C.L. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-egerton-sc-1806.