Sanders v. Courts

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. Courts

109 F. App'x 601

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2004·No. No. 04-6998·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Deputy Courts, 2004 WL 2165887, No. CA-02-208-2 (E.D.Va. May 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Deputy Courts, 2004 WL 2165887, No. CA-02-208-2 (E.D.Va. May 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sanders v. Courts, 109 F. App'x 601 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

109 F. App'x 601 (Sanders v. Courts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related