Sanders v. Commonwealth

318 S.W.2d 409
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedNovember 21, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 318 S.W.2d 409 (Sanders v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Commonwealth, 318 S.W.2d 409 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for appeal from a judgment of the Taylor Circuit Court, Honorable Philip Bertram, Judge, convicting Redford Sanders of unlawfully possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in local option territory and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for 60 days pursuant to KRS' 242.990.

The record reflects that defendant entered a plea of guilty and waived a trial by jury with advice of counsel. The contention of the defendant that his legal rights were prejudiced by the court inflicting greater punishment than the minimum fixed by law is without merit. King v. Commonwealth, Ky., 283 S.W.2d 707; Parsley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 272 S.W.2d 326.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parsley v. Commonwealth
272 S.W.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1954)
King v. Commonwealth
283 S.W.2d 707 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 S.W.2d 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1958.