Sanders v. Cleannet USA, Inc.
This text of 1 F. App'x 668 (Sanders v. Cleannet USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Leon Sanders appeals pro se an order of the district court sua sponte dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the district court intended its order to dismiss the action, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, see Nevada v. Burford, 918 F.2d 854, 855 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.
We review dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo. Crum v. Cir[669]*669cus Circus Enters., 231 F.3d 1129, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2000). Because the complaint alleged damages below the jurisdictional limit of 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice. Id.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-cleannet-usa-inc-ca9-2001.