Sanders v. Chalfoun, No. Cv 02-0813088 (Dec. 12, 2002)
This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 15747 (Sanders v. Chalfoun, No. Cv 02-0813088 (Dec. 12, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff and defendant lived together for about two years before April 19, 1997 and separated in June of 1997.
Defendant knowingly signed the Note for $60,000.00 on April 22, 1997 and he paid, to a great extent, in accordance with the terms beginning November 9, 1997 through July 5, 2001. The balance due on the note is $50,000.00.
The consideration for the note is not very specific but stems from various loans plaintiff made to the defendant.
As to the lack of consideration defense the plaintiff in her answer to interrogatories under oath said that the $60,000.00 of the note "reflected loans I made to him over time." Thus the defense was not established by preponderance of the evidence as is required. Taylor v.Hamden Hill School, Inc.,
The court can find no duress.
The plaintiff incurred attorney's fees which are allowed under the note for $4,462.50.
Plaintiff is entitled to interest at 10% on the unpaid balance of $50,000.00 from July 1, 2001 to date.
Judgment may enter for the plaintiff for $54,462.50 plus the interest due and costs. CT Page 15748
___________________ Norris L. O'Neill, J.
CT Page 15749
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 15747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-chalfoun-no-cv-02-0813088-dec-12-2002-connsuperct-2002.