Sanders v. Castaneda

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided October 7, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-01373·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 * * *

4 TIMOTHY SANDERS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01373-APG-EJY

5 Plaintiff,

6 v. ORDER

7 CASTANEDA, et al.,

8 Defendants.

9 10 On August 24, 2022, Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of 11 Corrections, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) together with a civil rights 12 Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. Plaintiff did not sign his IFP application 13 nor his complaint. Id. Because Plaintiff did not sign his IFP application, Plaintiff may not proceed 14 with in forma pauperis status. As such, Plaintiff’s IFP application is denied without prejudice. 15 Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff who is not represented 16 by counsel is required to sign every pleading, including a complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). 17 Plaintiff failed to sign his Complaint; therefore, the Court cannot consider it. If Plaintiff chooses 18 to file an amended complaint, he is advised that the amended complaint replaces the original 19 complaint, thus the amended complaint must be complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. 20 Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that “[t]he fact that a 21 party was named in the original complaint is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the 22 original”). Plaintiff’s amended complaint must contain all claims, defendants, and factual 23 allegations that Plaintiff wishes to pursue in this lawsuit. Moreover, Plaintiff must file the 24 amended complaint on this Court’s approved prisoner civil rights form, and it must be entitled 25 “Amended Complaint.” 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 27 pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED without prejudice. 28 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not consider Plaintiff’s unsigned 2 complaint (ECF No. 1-1). If Plaintiff choses to file an amended complaint, the document must be 3 titled “Amended Complaint.” The amended complaint must contain a short and plain statement 4 describing the underlying case showing that Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). 5 Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopts a flexible pleading standard, Plaintiff still 6 must give Defendant fair notice of Plaintiff’s claims. 7 Additionally, Plaintiff is advised that if he files an amended complaint, the original 8 Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) no longer serves any function in this case. As such, the amended 9 complaint must be complete in and of itself without reference to prior pleadings or other 10 documents. The Court cannot refer to a prior pleading or other documents to make Plaintiff’s 11 amended complaint complete. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted an extension of time up to and 13 including November 7, 2022 to file a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis containing 14 all three of the required documents and a signed amended complaint. Absent unusual 15 circumstances, the Court will not grant any further extensions of time. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved 17 form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled 18 information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. The Clerk of Court will 19 also send Plaintiff the approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and 20 a copy of his initial complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply with the terms of this Order will result 22 in a recommendation to dismiss this matter without prejudice for Plaintiff to refile the case with 23 the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff is able to file a signed IFP application and 24 amended complaint. 25 DATED this 7th day of October, 2022. 26

27 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanders v. Castaneda, (D. Nev. 2022).

Sanders v. Castaneda (Sanders v. Castaneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related