Sanders v. Beyer

93 S.E.2d 348, 94 Ga. App. 46, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 459
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 6, 1956
Docket36175
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 93 S.E.2d 348 (Sanders v. Beyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Beyer, 93 S.E.2d 348, 94 Ga. App. 46, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 459 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Felton, C. J.

A judgment based on the jury’s verdict cannot be set aside by a motion to set aside as long as the verdict upon which the judgment is based stands and has not been set aside by proper procedure (Buchanan v. Nash, 211 Ga. 343, 86 S. E. 2d 111); therefore the court erred in setting aside the judgment since it was based on a jury’s verdict which had not been set aside. The motion to set aside did not amount to a motion for a new trial.

The court erred in denying the motion to dismiss the motion to set aside and in setting aside the judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Morgan
150 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
HOMASOTE COMPANY v. Stanley
122 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Durham v. Pitts
114 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E.2d 348, 94 Ga. App. 46, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-beyer-gactapp-1956.